While there has been some recent progress on human rights in neighbouring Uzbekistan, the situation in Turkmenistan remains essentially unchanged and fundamental freedoms continue to be seriously curtailed in the context of the ongoing economic crisis. A journalist imprisoned three years ago was finally released, but only after serving out his sentence and in ill health. As before, any criticism of state policies are repressed.
This update covers developments relating to the protection of freedom of expression, association and assembly in Turkmenistan from March to June 2018. International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) and Turkmen Initiative for Human Rights (TIHR) have prepared it for the CIVICUS Monitor based on TIHR’s monitoring of the situation in this Central Asian country.
ODIHR final report on Turkmenistan’s parliamentary elections recommends ensuring integrity of electoral process, enabling people to exercise fundamental freedoms 🇹🇲 https://t.co/PnqNY6Pebr
— OSCE/ODIHR (@osce_odihr) May 30, 2018
On 25th March 2018, parliamentary elections took place in Turkmenistan. The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) did not carry out systematic or comprehensive monitoring of election-day proceedings but did deploy a small expert team to assess the elections. This team concluded that the “political environment is only nominally pluralist and does not offer voters political alternatives”, as well as that that the “[e]xercise of fundamental freedoms is severely curtailed, inhibiting free expression of the voters’ will”. The team stressed in particular that the “media landscape is characterized by the state’s monopoly and absence of alternative or critical views, depriving voters of the ability to make informed choices”.
As covered before, Turkmenistan nominally has a multi-party system; since the adoption of the country’s first-ever Law on Political Parties in 2012, two more political parties have emerged aside the pre-existing, so-called Democratic Party of Turkmenistan. However, all these parties are pro-presidential and the parliament is fully comprised of pro-presidential deputies. There is also no real division of power in the country and the parliament is not independent of the executive.
In the 2018 Press Freedom Index that Reporters Without Borders published in April 2018, Turkmenistan was ranked 178th out of 180 countries, with only Eritrea and North Korea behind it. This was the same ranking as Turkmenistan received in 2017. Reporters Without Borders pointed to the extensive government control of media, censorship of the internet and harassment of journalists working for media outlets based abroad (for more on recent developments in this area, please see below).
Turkmenistan has also repeatedly featured among the worst rated countries in other international surveys measuring civil and poltiical freedom across the world.
Today is World Press Freedom Day. Gaspar Matalaev has been imprisoned on false charges for 576 days. What for? Revealing state-orchestrated forced & child labor in Turkmenistan's cotton harvest. #FreeGaspar #WorldPressFreedomDay
— Cotton Campaign (@cottoncampaign) May 3, 2018
As covered in earlier updates, all national media outlets in Turkmenistan are controlled by the state and under pressure to focus on reporting about positive developments and achievements of the government, while refraining from covering the current economic crisis and other serious problems in the country. The new Law on TV and Radio Broadcasting adopted earlier this year requires that TV and radio broadcasts should create “a positive image of Turkmenistan”.
In a recent example of state-imposed propaganda, local media reported that “stability” had been achieved with respect to ensuring food security and that there is an “abundance” of agricultural products in the country, although there has been a lack of basic foodstuffs such as flower, egg, oil and sugar in the context of the current economic crisis. In some parts of the country, bread has become scarce.
The state also continues to interfere with the editorial policies of media and the president personally appoints and dismisses chief editors, although national law does not grant him such powers. For example, in April 2018, the president dismissed the deputy chief editor of the state-run journal Edebiýat we Sungat (Literature and Art), Kaybov Myratdurdy, and appointed another in his place, Allaberdyeva Ogulmaysa.
In Turkmenistan, a.k.a. Central Asia's North Korea, food shortage and rationing of certain items like sugar, eggs and butter, reported in the country's capital Ashgabat accord to this source. RFERL Turkmen service said passport needed to buy loaf of bread https://t.co/mSOnRwNFM5 pic.twitter.com/hJTmC94DQC
— Ryskeldi Satke (@RyskeldiSatke) June 22, 2018
The authorities continue their arbitrary campaign against satellite dishes, which residents use to watch and listen to foreign TV and radio channels as an alternative to national, state-controlled channels. This campaign has been under way for years, with privately owned satellite dishes being forcibly removed under the pretext that they spoil the city view. In a recent case, in April 2018, the local authorities in Turkmenbashi removed satellite dishes from apartment buildings facing major streets in the city without requesting the consent of the owners. According to information from the Netherlands-based exiled NGO, the Democratic Civic Union, with which TIHR cooperates, more than 400 satellite dishes were dismantled in Turkmenbashi.
Critical voices, including journalists working for the Prague-based Turkmen service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) and other foreign outlets, continue to be persecuted.
As covered before, RFE/RL correspondent Soltan Achilova has repeatedly been subjected to intimidation and harassment. During the period covered by this update, new cases of harassment took place. On 9th May 2018, when Achilova was taking pictures near the Eternal Flame memorial in an Ashgabat suburb for an article about Victory Day celebrations, a group of unknown perpetrators dressed in civilian clothes assaulted her. According to the journalist, they insulted her, took away her camera and deleted her photos, forced her into a car and threatened her if she did not stop working for RFE/RL. After being held for two hours, she was allowed to go. In another incident on 9th June 2018, in the city of Yoloten, two unknown young men attacked Achilova, accusing her of taking photos without permission, and attempting to take her bag and hitting her so hard she fell to the ground. After passers-by intervened, the perpetrators fled. The journalist told RFE/RL that police also arbitrarily confiscated the car of her relatives with whom she was staying in Yoloten, indicating that they had received an order from above to do so during her visit to the city. The car was returned to her relatives after two days.
Achilova’s children have also faced harassment in apparent retaliation for her journalistic work. Unknown perpetrators broke the window of the car of her disabled son in April 2017, and while police opened an investigation, it was soon closed without results, although the attack had been caught on camera. Achilova’s daughter has been banned from travelling abroad without explanation, a measure sanctioned by the migration service. In a recent response to a complaint filed by Achilova on behalf of her children, the country’s Ombudsperson simply stated that the measures taken by the authorities were “lawful”. This concise response thwarted the journalist’s hopes for a thorough and impartial assessment of her complaint.
Veteran RFE/RL Turkmen Service correspondent Soltan Achilova, 69, has been the target of no fewer than 11 physical attacks over the last two years in retaliation for her journalism. The campaign against her is illustrated here. https://t.co/24sY441jNq
— RFE/RL Pressroom (@RFERLPress) June 20, 2018
As covered in earlier updates, Turkmenistan’s authorities forcibly mobilise residents to attend and participate in various official gatherings and celebrations. This practice runs contrary to the right to freedom of assembly, a basic element of which is voluntary participation in assemblies. Among others, UN experts have criticised the state’s actions in this regard.
A recent example of this problematic practice is as follows: